WHY THE CRITICS ASSAIL DANIEL
Dr. W. A. Criswell
Daniel 1:17
09-10-67
Today is: Why The Critics Assail The
Book Of Daniel. Then, next Sunday,
the title of the sermon is: Daniel In The Critic’s Den. And then the next Sunday is: How The Critics
Fare In The Fiery Furnace.
Now, the message today is: Why The
Critics Assail The Book Of Daniel.
Not in any wise as a text, or as a passage that I shall expound, but
just as an introductory word, Daniel 1:17: “And Daniel had understanding in all
visions and dreams.” Now, the subject: Why
The Critics Assail The Book Of Daniel.
There is not a liberal theologian in the world that accepts the book of
Daniel. And most of the theologians of
the world are liberal. There is not a
liberal theologian in the world—and Dallas is full of them—there is not a
liberal theologian in the world that accepts the book of Daniel. They deny its authenticity and its
integrity. They look upon
the book of Daniel as spurious, as a forgery.
They avow that its contents are pure fiction.
Why this vicious and unswerving,
unwavering attack on the book of Daniel?
The answer is very simple and we shall follow it through the message
this morning. Why does the liberal
theologian assail the book of Daniel?
Because it is his purpose to take out of the Bible all that is
miraculous and all that is supernatural.
It is their purpose to make of this holy Book a human book like that
produced by men in other faiths, in other philosophies and in other
religions. And in order to implement that
purpose, to destroy the supernatural and the miraculous in the Bible, they
begin with the book of Daniel for two reasons:
First, because they think that the book of Daniel is the most
vulnerable. It is the most easily
attacked and, to them, destroyed.
Second, no matter how the rationalist might explain away every other
miracle in the Bible, as long as the book of Daniel stands, his skepticism
becomes ridiculous and inane. The book
of Daniel must be destroyed if the miraculous, and if the supernatural, is
taken out of the Word of God.
Now, I want to speak for a few minutes
on prophecy in the Bible. First,
prophecy runs through the Bible like a great Gulf Stream from shore to
shore. To my amazement, one of the
scholarly authors I read avowed that two-thirds of the Holy Scriptures are
prophetic either in type, symbol or in outright prediction. And he further avowed that one-half of those
prophecies are yet to be fulfilled. So
the Bible is fundamentally and really a prophetic book. Prophecy in the Bible is not incidental; it
is foundational, and primary, and central.
Second, the Bible is unique. It is separate and apart in this—that it
contains prophecy. The religious books
of no other religions in the world, no other religions in the world, have in
them prophecy. And the reason for it is
very plain and patent. If the human
authors of these sacred books of other religions were to propose, to predict
the future, their mis-guesses, their miscalculations, their un-fulfillments,
their errors and their mistakes would make them appear grossly ignorant and
inane. Only God knows the future. And no other religious sacred book in the
earth purports to prophesy the future except the great Lord God through this
Book that I hold in my hand.
And in no small measure do the Holy
Scriptures use prophecy, prediction, as a foundation for the authority, and
inspiration, and authenticity of their message. For example, the Lord Jesus said to His disciples: “And now, I have
told you before it come to pass that when it is come to pass, ye may
believe.”
No man knows the future. If you know it five minutes, I can make a
millionaire out of you almost overnight.
If you will know what will happen five minutes ahead of the time, I can
take you to the stock market, buy the stock, five minutes later, sell it—or ten
minutes later sell it, and you’ll be rich overnight. If you know the future five minutes, just a little while, just
enough to buy the stock, see it run up, sell it—get this one, buy it, see it
run up, sell it—buy that one, see it run up, sell it—just like that. There’s not any man in the earth who knows
the future. It is only the prerogative
of God to know the tomorrow.
So, prediction, prophecy is a
foundational argument for the authenticity of the message that God
delivers. And Jesus used it. “I tell you,” he said to his disciples,
“what’s going to happen so that when it happens, you may be confirmed in the
faith.”
Now, that same thing was used by Moses
in the definition of a prophet. How do
you know a true prophet? And the word
that he delivers is from God? So Moses
writes: “And if thou say in thine
heart: How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken? When a prophet speaketh in the name of the
Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the
Lord hath not spoken.”
God’s not lying to us when He says
thus-and-so, and that-and-so and yonder-and-so. God is truth and God knows the future. And if this prophet, who purports to be a prophet, says: “God
predicts so-and-so, and the thing falls to the ground, he’s not a prophet, for
God doesn’t make mistakes.”
The prophet hath spoken it
presumptuously when he predicts and it doesn’t come to pass—it is God that
reveals the secret things. For example,
Daniel stood before king Nebuchadnezzar and said: “Oh, king, the great mighty God hath made known unto you the
things which shall come to pass hereafter.
And the dream is certain and the interpretation is sure.” That is God! Prophecy is a manifestation of the truth, and the revelation, and
the presence, and the purpose, and the plan of God. And only He can reveal it.
Now, a prophet and prophecy is
two-fold. It is heartative. It is sermonic. It is homiletical. It is
exhortative. It is exhortation. Prophecy is a man standing up to deliver a
message. And prophecy is, second, also
predictive.
It is heartative—it is appealing to the
people to love God and give their lives to the Lord—it is heartative. And it can be also be predictive: That is, a
prophet is a “forth-teller.” He is a
pleader for God. And he can also be a
“foreteller,” predicting things that God has revealed.
The prophet has divine insight. He understands the events of the day. And he delivers God’s message in the
hour. A prophet has divine insight—a
prophet can also have divine foresight.
God reveals to him the future.
And the message the prophet delivered was not a deduction of human
reasoning, but it was a revelation imported to him by the Holy Spirit. As 2 Peter 1:21 avows: “For the prophecy
came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were
moved by the Holy Spirit.”
Now, in the likening of prophecy to a
great river through the Bible--here are times when it broadens and when it
deepens into veritable seas. And twice
is that especially true: Once in the Old Testament in the book of Daniel, and
once in the New Testament in apocalypse, in the Revelation.
Now, how is it that it would be
possible to attack prophecy? Here it is
written on the page, clear, plain. And
here, in the after years and the after years and the after years, it is
fulfilled. How could you attack like
that? It is said here, plainly written
on the page and here it is fulfilled in the after centuries. How do you get rid of a phenomenon like
that? Well, it is easy to see how. The critic who assails the Bible, he’s
taking the supernatural out of the Word of God. He’s ridding the Holy Scriptures of the miraculous. He’s making it just like any other human
book. It is easy to see how he gets rid
of the miraculous in the Bible.
For example, the critic will say: “So
the story reads, he avows, that Israel went through the Red Sea and the seas
parted. Actually,” the critic says, “it
was not a Red Sea like we know over there between Sinai and Egypt. It was a “Reed Sea,” it was a swamp, and
they just waded through it, walked through it like any other army would
do—nothing miraculous about it.
Same thing as they would say about the
manna that God sent down from heaven to feed His children in the
wilderness—there was no manna from heaven.
They ate the oozing of a desert plant.
And it was nutritious enough to keep them alive. Nothing miraculous about it!
Just as they would say about Elijah on
Mount Carmel when he prayed and God answered by fire from heaven. The critic would say: “Nothing miraculous in
it at all. It just happened to be that
when Elijah got through praying a thunderbolt of lightning came down and struck
the altar. That’s all.”
And about the resurrection of Jesus: “He
never actually was raised from the dead.
They, the disciples, had hallucinations and visions, and they just
thought they saw Him raised from the dead.”
Same thing about the miraculous
conversion of the apostle Paul on the road to Damascus: He didn’t actually see
the Son of God, nor was there anything miraculous in what happened to him. He was hit by a sunstroke; or as most of
them say, he had an epileptic fit.
Most of the critics think of Paul as being an epileptic.
So, with all of the de-supernaturalizing of the Word of God, they take
every miracle and they rationalize it away and there’s nothing miraculous
left. It’s just plain human cause and
human effect.
But how do you do that to prophecy? Here it is written on the page and here it
is fulfilled centuries later! How do
you attack prophecy? Porphyry showed
the way. And we’re going to get
acquainted Porphyry. Porphyry was born
in 233 A.D., in Tyre, Syria. He studied
for a while under Origen, the greatest intellect among the church fathers in
Caesarea, from which fact they surmised that he might at one time have been a
Christian.
In any event, when he left Origen the
church father, the greatest intellect among them, he went to Rome and studied
there under Plotinus, the world-famed Neo-Platonic philosopher. And Porphyry became a passionate disciple of
his master. And he popularized the
Neo-Platonic philosophy throughout the Roman Empire. Porphyry was a pagan and a heathen. And he defended polytheism, and the national gods, and the
worship of idols in the temples. But
Porphyry, along with his fellow Neo-Platonists, felt that the mortal, Hellenic,
Greek, speculative philosophy and of the national gods, the multiplicity of
gods, he felt that the mortal enemy of speculative Greek philosophy and polytheism
was Christianity. So, Porphyry took
upon himself to write fifteen books that he entitled: Against The
Christians.
Now, Porphyry was one of the most
distinguished scholars of all time. He
had a marvelous gift in research, in philosophical erudition. And in those fifteen books Porphyry
attacked Christianity in a different way.
Because of his ability for research, and because of his vast learning,
the attack of Porphyry against the Christian faith was made against the sacred
books on which Christianity was founded.
Porphyry attacked the Bible the Christians used, which at that time was
mostly the Old Testament, the Septuagint.
So rabid was Porphyry, and so vicious
was his attack, that he became known as the most rabid and vicious of all of
the enemies of the Christian faith.
Now, in those fifteen books that he wrote against the documents, the
sacred literature, the books that the Christians used, the Bible, naturally he
came to Daniel. And it was against
Daniel that he focused the main brunt of that attack, and this is the way that
he did it. Being learned, and
scholarly, and erudite, and able to go into all of the researches of the
languages of the past, Porphyry said—this heathen, pagan philosopher said—that
there never was a Daniel. He never existed. There never was such a prophecy written as
it was purported to have been written in the exile in the sixth century B.C.,
about 535 B.C. But rather it is a
forgery, it is a fiction, he said. And
it was written in the time of the Maccabees, about 165 B.C.; hundreds of years
after all of those things had already come to pass. And that the prophecy of Daniel is nothing other than a spurious
writing that some unknown Jew took upon himself and made it as though he had
written it four hundred years before and outlined all of those periods of
history that followed after. This was
the attack of Porphyry, the heathen, pagan philosopher against the Christian
faith.
Now, it was an insult. It was an insult to the Christian
community. And in 448 A.D., Emperor
Theodosius II publicly burned the works of Porphyry. And thereafter it had no effect on the mainstream Christian for
centuries, and centuries, and centuries.
That is, until the birth of German rationalism. And until there came into the world the phenomenon
the school of the higher critics, who took the Bible and sought to make of it
just another human book.
Now, Satan has no new tricks. He has no new approaches. He has no new ideas. What Satan does today is the same thing he
did yesterday—is the same thing he did in the beginning when he started to
destroy the Adamic race. Satan has no
tricks that are new. It’s the same
thing over and over again. Nor is he
able to attack the Christian faith in any new way. He just repeats the same thing over and over again. There is not a modern attack against the
Christian faith that was not made by Celsus in 150 A.D. This modern day of science, everything that
is said against Christian faith was said by Celsus, scientific and all, in 150
A.D.
It is the same thing with the higher
critic today. What he did was, he went
back to that heathen, pagan philosopher Porphyry, in his vicious and merciless
attack against Christ, and the Christians, and the books of the Christian. And the higher critic merely mouths and
re-mouths, and says and re-says those same things that Porphyry said in 268
A.D. And to my amazement, at least, the
attack of Porphyry against Christianity, and against the book of Daniel, has
been received, and accepted, and authenticated, and believed by every liberal
Christian theologian in the world.
There is no exception. There is
not a liberal theologian in the world but that believes exactly what the
heathen, pagan Porphyry said about the book of Daniel. You wouldn’t think that a merciless and
cruel enemy of Christianity—who sought to destroy and uproot it—you wouldn’t
think that he would be a parent of modern Christian theologians. Such is the depravity of this present
theological world!
Now Pastor, why should we be
concerned? For these reasons: First,
because Jesus called Daniel a prophet.
That’s why I had you read the passage in the great apocalyptic discourse
of our Lord in Matthew 24. Jesus did
not say: “Daniel, the deceiver.” Jesus
did not say: “Daniel, the forger.”
Jesus did not say: “Daniel, the spurious writer.” But Jesus said: “Daniel, the prophet.” Jesus said Daniel was a prophet. That’s the first thing.
Second, the prophecies of Daniel are the
basic foundational introduction to the Christian religion and the Christian faith. The prophecies of Daniel are the
introduction to all prophecy in the New Testament, and most especially to the
apocalypse. The Revelation in the New
Testament is nothing other than an expounding and an expiation upon the
prophecies of Daniel. Daniel is
foundational to the Christian faith as we know it, and believe it and as it is
written here in the Book.
I copied, for example, out of Sir Isaac
Newton, one of the great scientists of all time, who discovered the law of
gravity. He wrote a book entitled: “Observations
Upon the Prophecy of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John.” And, on Page 10 of that book, Sir Isaac
Newton writes, and I quote: “Whosoever rejects the prophecies of Daniel does as
much as if he undermined the Christian religion, which, so to speak, is founded
on Daniel’s prophecies of Christ.“
I repeat, first, Jesus said Daniel was a
prophet. Second, the prophecies of
Daniel are foundational to the New Testament, to the Christian faith, to the
revealed religion of our Lord. Third,
the book of Daniel is a classic in itself.
Read it! Read it again, reread
it and you will feel in it the voice and the variable presence of God. The attack on Daniel comes out and is
founded on the exigencies and the necessities of rational criticism. That’s where it is born. They can do away with the miracles in the
Bible by their natural humanistic explanations that I have referred to: No fire
from God on Elijah’s altar, just happened to be a bolt of lightning. No resurrection of Jesus from the dead; they
were hallucinations of the disciples.
No conversion of the apostle Paul; he was an epileptic.
They can do away by rationalizing the
miracles. No matter how you might think
the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah, no liberal theologian in the world would
ever accept it as being Messianic in its description of the Lord Christ. They can humanize and do away with every
miracle in the Bible; but they cannot destroy the supernatural and the
miraculous in the Bible as long as Daniel stands. For if Daniel said these things in the [sixth] century B.C., and
they came to pass in the centuries thereafter, we have here an insurmountable
evidence of the intervention and the revelation of Almighty God. So they must destroy Daniel. And that’s why the virago of attack against
that mighty prophet.
Third, I have said why it concerns
us—one, Jesus called Daniel a prophet; second, the prophecies of Daniel are
foundational to all of the prophecies of the New Testament—third, I have said
Daniel has in it God, theo pneusta, the God-breathed presence. And to read it is to feel God speaking. And the attack against it lies in the
necessities, in the exigencies of rational criticism. They have to destroy to take the supernatural out of the
Bible.
Fourth and last, when you destroy
prophecy, you destroy the Christian religion as we know it, and as it is
revealed in The Book. When you lower
this Book to the common denominator of any other human book, you destroy
Christianity as God has revealed it to us.
For you see, the Christian faith is a self-revelation of God—a
self-disclosure of God. Job cried
saying: “No man by searching can find God.”
You can look through your telescope forever, you’d never know God. You can look through your microscope
forever, you’d never know God. You’d
never know His name; you’d never know His redemptive love. You can study scientific manuals forever,
you’d never know God.
The only way we can ever know God is
through a self-disclosure, a self-revelation of the Lord. And this Bible is not a man searching for
God. This Bible is God searching for
man. It is the Lord God reaching down
from heaven to reveal Himself in love, and grace, and mercy through Jesus
Christ to a lost Adamic race.
And when we take the supernatural out of
the Bible, and when we take the miraculous out of the Bible, and when we take
the prophetic out of the Bible, and when we take God’s self-disclosure out of
the Bible, you have nothing left but another system of philosophy that may not
be any better than those that have died in the centuries past.
It is fundamental and foundational to
the Christian faith—prophecy and the self-revelation of God. And it was on that great foundation that God
spake and men heard; and these things came to pass that those first apostles
stood in the power of the Holy Spirit and delivered the message of the Son of
God.
I need not remind you. You know, in the Bible that in the twenty-first chapter of the
book of Luke as the two went on the way to Emmaus and it says: “And the Lord
Jesus, beginning at Moses and all of the prophets, expounded to them in all of
the scriptures the thing concerning Himself.”
That’s God’s way of authenticating the truth of the Christian message.
I need not remind you in the tenth
chapter of the book of Acts, when Simon Peter stood in the household of
Cornelius, that Simon Peter said: “And to Him, to the Lord Jesus Christ, give
all the prophets witness that through faith in His name we might receive
remission of sins.”
I need not remind you of the
twenty-sixth chapter of the book of Acts when Paul stood in the court in
Caesarea before king Herod Agrippa II and said to the king: “Believest thou the
prophet? O King, I know thou
believest.” And that wonderful verse I
quoted twice already, 2 Peter 1:21: “For the prophecy came not in old time by
the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy
Spirit.” And as the great revelator in
the apocalypse wrote: “For the spirit of prophecy is the testimony of Jesus.”
Every prophet took it and said: “This is
He—Look! He’s coming! This is He. Look! He’s coming! This is He! Look! He’s
coming!” Moses, Samuel, Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Daniel, Malachi: “Look! He is
coming!”
“To Him give all of the prophets
witness.” And they spake not by human
deduction or human reasoning—but their message was imported by the Holy Spirit
of God. And the witness of the prophets
is the great authentication of the Christian faith. And what God hath done in these centuries past, in bringing His
world to fulfillment. God will yet do
in that other half of that prophetic word that is yet to be fulfilled. And these days, when we gather in this holy
place and open that book, we shall read together what God hath shown of the
today, and of the tomorrow, and of the glorious consummation. That’s Daniel’s great sweep of the
ages. He’s the prophet of the time of
the Gentiles and he sweeps to that marvelous consummation when the Lord
Messiah, the Ancient of Days, shall come.
And the kingdoms of the world will become the kingdoms of our Lord and
of His Christ. And He reigns forever
and forever. Amen and amen. We must close. May God bless us as we study, and as we begin, and as we sit at
the feet of the Holy Spirit and let Him teach us these marvelous revelations
and disclosures of the ages.
Now, we must sing our song, and while we
sing it, you to give your heart to the Lord; you to accept the Lord as your
Savior; a family you, coming into the church; A couple you or just one somebody
you, while we sing this song of appeal, into the aisle and down to the front,
make it now. Come this morning. There is a stairway on either side at the
front and the back and there’s time and to spare. Come the throng in this balcony, come and welcome. And the press of people on this lower floor,
into that aisle and down here stand by me: “Here I am, Pastor, and here I
come. I choose today and here I
am.” Make it now, come now; on the
first note of the first stanza, come.
Do it! While we stand and while
we sing.
.