SPEAKING
IN UNKNOWN TONGUES
Dr.
W. A. Criswell
1
Corinthians 14:1-40
7-10-66
10:50 a.m.
On the
radio and on television, you are sharing the First Baptist Church morning
service here in Dallas. This is the pastor bringing the message entitled Speaking
in Tongues. For a very long time we have been in a series of sermons on
the Holy Spirit, and in that series, there is now a series being preached on
the gifts of the Spirit. In Romans, in Ephesians, in 1 Corinthians, Paul names
thirty of those gifts; nineteen different ones. Four of them are sign gifts;
the gift of miracles, the gifts of healing, the gift of speaking in tongues,
and the gift of interpretation of tongues. Next Sunday morning, the sermon
will be The Interpretation of Tongues. Today, the sermon is the gift of Speaking
in Tongues. I suppose that I have been years and years in preparation
on this sermon, yet when I had finished it and looked at it, one would have
thought it could have been done in five minutes. But there hasn’t been anything
over which I have struggled, in my own spirit, and in my study, and in my own
observation in the thirty-eight years that I have been a preacher, more than
over this subject of glossolalia. That’s a funny-sounding name:
glossolalia, speaking in tongues.
For about
two thousand years it was almost unknown and unheard of, and then in the middle
of the last century there was an Englishman by the name of Irving, a tall
fellow about six feet, five inches tall, with his hair uncut, long, flowing
over his shoulders, a Presbyterian, and associated with the world-famed Dr.
Chalmers, and he led a movement, a tongue-speaking movement. And it has
appeared again in this century and in our day. Some of the finest Baptist
churches in this state are divided, cleft, tragically so, and some of the fine
churches in this city wrestle with that at this present moment. So when
we address ourselves to this subject, we are looking at one of the phenomenal
developments in Christendom this very hour.
Now, how
shall I do it? These two sermons ought to be together, the one next
Sunday and the one this Sunday, but there is not the beginning of time to
present them, so I just pray I could hope that you could listen next Sunday
also. And if you are unable to, these sermons will be printed in a
book. The book will be out the last of this year. It will be
entitled The Holy Spirit in Today’s World.
Now,
presenting the message; do you remember a television program called
“Dragnet,” And there was a man by the name of Webb who was the detective
in that long series? And in everyone of the stories, there always was
developed a scene wherein the detective will say to a man, usually garrulous,
that he was questioning, he would say, quote, “Just the facts, mister, just
give me the facts.” Do you remember that? “Just the facts, mister,
just give me the facts.” This sermon will be that. “Just the facts, preacher,
just give me the facts”: What does God say? What does the Bible
say? What is presented in the Holy Scriptures? And then next
Sunday, we shall speak on the interpretation.
Now, the
facts: what are the facts of glossolalia? When I turn to the second
chapter of the Book of Acts: “When the day of Pentecost was fully come, there
came suddenly a sound from heaven as of a rushing, mighty wind,” the first
miracle, “and there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire,” the
second miracle. Over in Embry Hall, there is a magnificent painting that
will be greatly enlarged and housed in one of the magnificent structures in the
city of Dallas beyond North Park. It is in the Hillcrest Cemetery area, as you
have in Forest Lawn in Los Angeles. The marvelous miracle of Pentecost is
presented in that glorious project. Now, the third miracle was: “And they
were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues as
the Spirit gave them utterance.”
Now, there
were dwelling there in Jerusalem Jews, Hellenists from all over the world. And
they heard every man [speak] in his own language,” the glorious works of God,
“and they were amazed and marveled, saying, Aren't all of these which speak
Galileans? How hear we then every man in [our] own tongue wherein [we
were] born?” Parthians and Medes, Elamites, Mesopotamians, Judeans,
Cappadocians, Babylonians, Greeks, Romans, Latins—it was a phenomenal miracle,
three of them: the sound of a rushing mighty wind, the fire as it parted and
lambently flamed upwards over the head of each apostle, and the preaching of
the gospel of the Son of God in languages. And all of the people, all of
those representatives of those languages could hear it and understand it, and
they were amazed by it.
I turn the
page now to the tenth chapter of the Book of Acts. In the household of
Cornelius at Caesarea, when Peter was done with his sermon in verse 44 of
chapter 10, “While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Spirit fell on
all of them which heard the Word. And those Jews that were there with
Simon Peter were amazed because on these Gentiles also was poured out the gift
of the Holy Spirit. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify
God.”
Now the
third time in the Book of Acts: in chapter 19, “It came to pass that Paul
found certain disciples. And he said to them: Have you received the Holy
Spirit,” and the King James Version is translated, “since ye believed?” [Acts
19:2].
Pisteusontes: when you believed. Did you receive the Holy Spirit
when you were saved? When you believed? They said unto him, “We
haven’t heard so much whether there be a Holy Spirit.” And he said, “Well,
whose disciples are you then?” And they said, “John the Baptist.”
The Baptist movement did not die when John was beheaded—and I am preaching on
the martyrdom of John the Baptist tonight—but the Baptist movement continued
alongside the Christian movement, and the disciples of John made disciples, who
made disciples, who made disciples, who made disciples, and there are disciples
of John the Baptist today. And these men were disciples of disciples, of
disciples, of disciples, of disciples of John the Baptist.
Now John
the Baptist preached the Holy Spirit. These men haven’t even heard of
such a thing as the Holy Spirit. So Paul preached the gospel unto them,
and they were saved, and they were baptized. “And when Paul had laid his
hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came upon them and they spake with tongues and
prophesied,” magnified God.
Now, that
is all in the Book of Acts. I have read all of it to you. There is
one other place in the New Testament, and it is in the passage of 1 Corinthians,
chapter 12, chapter 13, and chapter 14. In 1 Corinthians, chapter 12, in
listing the nine gifts of the Spirit here, the last two are: “To another,
diverse kinds of tongues, and to another, the interpretation of tongues.”
Then chapter 14 is a discussion of this gift of speaking in tongues. In
Pentecost it was an understood language, but in the Corinthians' church it is
an un-understandable language. It is an unknown tongue. In the
second verse, Paul says: “He that speaketh in an unknown tongue, speaketh not unto
men, but unto God. For no man understandeth him. It is an unknown
tongue.” And in verse 14: “For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit
prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful. “ It is an unknown
tongue.
Glossolalia,
an unknown tongue; I am astonished at many things in the Bible, in the Word of
God. I am astonished at this! I am amazed at it! I am
overwhelmed by it!
“But the
facts, mister, just tell us the facts.” These are the facts.
One: the saints of the Old Testament had all of the gifts of the Spirit.
All of them are seen in the spirit-filled men of God of the Old Testament, but
not this. This phenomenon is not seen in the Old Testament, nor is there
any approach to it. Second: this phenomenon of speaking in unknown,
un-understandable tongues is not seen in the life of our Lord.
And to be
honest, again, I could not conceive of Jesus the Son of God speaking in unknown
tongues. Nor is there anything in the life of our master that
approximates it or approaches it. In the Gospels, it is never mentioned,
never referred to. The most spiritual gospel, that of John, never
mentions it. It is not seen in the life or ministry of our Lord. In
the listing of the gifts in Romans and in Ephesians, it is never referred to.
Nor is it found in any church, except in this one church in Corinth that
Paul—that Paul calls a carnal church, and the people as babes in Christ.
It is not found in the churches of Macedonia, in the churches of Achaia, in the
churches of Asia, in the churches of Judea, in the churches of Samaria, in the
churches of Rome; it is never referred to. The only time it is ever seen
is in this one carnal church in Corinth, in Corinth. It is never referred
to in the epistles of Paul except here in the letter to Corinth. It is never
referred to in the pastoral epistles when Paul writes to his young sons in the
ministry how to conduct a house of God, how to carry on the work of the Lord.
It is never referred to. It is never referred to in the Book of Hebrews.
It is never referred to in the general epistles by Peter, James and by John,
and it is never referred to in the Revelation. It is a phenomenon that
you find only in this church in Corinth, this speaking in an unknown
tongue.
So I take
up this Holy Book and I read what Paul has to say in this fourteenth Chapter of
1 Corinthians about glossolalia, speaking in unknown tongues. And when I
read that chapter, I can see plainly, evidently, lucidly, I can see that Paul
is wrestling with a problem in the church at Corinth. It is always a
problem! It has never been anything else in the history of the world but
a problem! And Paul is wrestling with it here in the church at Corinth,
plainly, manifestly.
“Why,” he
says, “when you come together as a church and you speak in tongues, and there
comes an unbeliever, will he not say: You are”—and it is translated
here—“mad?” The Greek word is mainomai, which is a Greek
word for “insane.” When I turn to the last verse in that chapter, he
says: “Let all things be done decently and in order.” He’s having trouble
with it. It is a problem in the church at Corinth! Can’t you see
the difference?
Had the
church at Corinth given itself to great things, Paul would have commended them
and encouraged them. Had the church at Corinth given themselves to a
great sacrificial commitment to God, he would have written words of
encouragement and commendation. Had they been given to prayer, to
intercession, to witness, to testimony, to any of the fruits of the Spirit,
Paul would have written to them words of commendation. But he is
wrestling with this problem! It is a problem in the church at Corinth!
And this chapter that Paul writes concerning glossolalia, speaking in tongues,
this chapter is not a series of rules to speak in tongues, but it is a series
of mandates to restrict it! In every way possible, Paul is seeking to
control, to dissuade, to discourage!
“Just give
me the facts, mister, give me the facts.” We are going to look at every one of
them. Even in these words where Paul speaks of speaking in tongues in the
spirit of permission and understanding, he will always put a “but” with
it. I am going to read them all. I am going to read every time that
he says anything that might open the door to glossolalia. But every time
he will say something of permission, he will say “but”—and then seek to
interdict its use and its practice and its exercise. Look at it, 1
Corinthians 14, verse 4: “He that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth
himself; but he that” speaks intelligibly, “prophesies,” speaks out, “edifieth
the church.” When a man speaks in an unknown tongue, he may build up his
own spiritual egotism and his own feeling of rapture or ecstasy, but, says
Paul, for the church, we need a plain and intelligible language.
All right,
turn the page and look at that “but” again: verse 5. Turn the page just a
little. I forget you don’t have my Bible. Verse 5: “I would,” he
says, “that ye all spake with tongues, but”—and always it is there—“I would
that you all spake with tongues, but rather that you spake intelligently and
intelligibly.” All right, once again, verse 18: “I thank my God
that I speak with tongues more than you all. But”—always that—“but in the
church, I had rather speak quiet words with my understanding than by my voice
that I might teach others also than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.”
Now, there
is one other place; we are reading all of them. The twenty-ninth verse:
“Forbid not to speak with tongues. But brethren, covet to prophesy, to
speak to edification, and intelligently.” I am just repeating that when
you read that chapter, Paul is wrestling with a problem! It is a divisive
problem even in this carnal church in Corinth. All right, having seen the
tenor and the feelings in the heart of the apostle as he writes, now let’s see
what he says. Just the facts, mister, what are the facts?
One: did
you ever see such tremendous odds as Paul writes? “In the church, I had rather
speak five words with my understanding,” five words with my understanding,
“that by my voice I might teach others also, than ten thousand words in an
unknown tongue.” Five to ten thousand. Did you ever see such
tremendous odds? And yet there are men who had rather give themselves to
that deprecatory situation that Paul described. Five to ten thousand and
I don’t understand it. I don’t understand it. He’s doing everything
possible to dissuade, to discourage. Let us speak five words
intelligently, understandably, than ten thousand in an unknown tongue.
All right,
second—just give us the facts, mister, just the facts—second: “Let your women
keep silence in the churches. It is not permitted unto them to
speak. And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at
home. For it is a shame for women to speak in the church.” Now, I
turn the page in my Bible. I turn the page, and here in the eleventh
chapter of 1 Corinthians, Paul has just described how a woman ought to dress
when she prays in public and when she prophesies in public.
Now, this
man Paul is stupid if he cannot remember that one page over he just got through
writing how a woman is to dress when she prays in public and when she
prophesies, when she speaks out in public; and turn the page, and he writes,
“Let the women keep silence in the churches, it is not permitted for them to
speak. For it is a shame for the woman to speak in the church.”
Well, the reason and the answer is plain. He has spoken here of these
women in the very heart and middle in the chapter on glossolalia, and he is
talking about a woman speaking in an unknown tongue! He’s talking about
speaking in tongues!
Well, why
would Paul object to a woman speaking in an unknown tongue? When you
study ancient Greek history, it is very apparent, most apparent. If you
have ever visited the ancient site of Corinth, the sea is right here and the
city is here; the ancient city was built here. And right there in the
most impressive Acrocorinthus you could ever imagine, the Acropolis of Corinth:
far more majestic, higher, larger than the Acropolis in Athens down by the
Parthenon—the Acropolis of Corinth, and on top of that Acropolis was a glorious
Greek temple to Aphrodite. Her Latin name is Venus, and in that ancient
day, they worshiped the goddess Aphrodite, Venus, in sexual orgies. When
a man went up to worship Aphrodite, that’s the way he worshiped her. The
filth and the dirt of those ancient religious worships lie untranslatable in
the language in which they have lain for thousands of years. You don’t
translate it into modern language. And everyone of those temples had
women dedicated to the goddess. And those women, in order to carry
through those orgies of worship, worked themselves up into frenzies!
And Paul
said if that were to happen by an unbeliever, and he stopped, and he looked in,
and there your women are speaking in unknown tongues, he would say, “Well, we
have a little colony of Aphrodites here. Let’s go in and take part of the
orgy.” “No!” said Paul; such a thing is unthought for; it is unnameable
in the house of God and in the churches of Christ! Let your women keep
silence. It is a shame, as up there in Aphrodite, it is a shame for a
woman to speak in an unknown tongue in the church. And you take the women out
of the unknown tongues movement and it will die overnight. The frenzy, the
ecstasy, the unknown glossolalia is kept alive by women, and Paul says, “No!”
Just the
facts, mister, just the facts. Well, what is this? And what is its
purpose? God has a purpose at Pentecost. You saw it. At Caesarea
in the household of the Gentiles you saw it, and at Ephesus you saw it, and
here he is speaking of it. This thing is in the Bible. Well, what does it
mean? Where did it come from, and what is its purpose? Just the
facts, mister, just tell us the facts. Paul, under the inspiration of
God, interprets what God has done, and what it meant. You listen.
Verse 21, 22: “In the law”—that’s in the Old Testament—“In the law it is
written, With men of other tongues and other lips will I speak unto this
people; and yet for all that they will not hear Me, saith the Lord. Wherefore
tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe
not.”
Well, what
does it mean? What is Paul speaking of here? In this glossolalia,
in this speaking of tongues, what does he mean? Why, it is simple.
It is plain. He is quoting here Isaiah 28:11 in the Old Testament, which
is called the law of the whole book. In the Old Testament “it is
written,” then he quotes Isaiah 28:11: “With men of other tongues and other
lips will I speak to these people and yet for all of that they will not obey
Me.” They will not repent and believe Me and trust Me. Now, the
historical context of that prophecy of Isaiah was this: The Lord said to His
prophet Isaiah, “You say to these people, 'I have spoken to you plainly.
I have spoken to you in intelligent language. I have spoken to you in a
language you can understand, in your mother’s tongue, but you are obstinate,
and recalcitrant, and incorrigible, and disobedient. Now, says the Lord
God, I am going to speak to you in a language that you can’t understand, with
foreign tongues.'” And the historical context is God brought in the
Assyrian, and they couldn’t understand Assyrian, and God brought in the
Babylonians, and they couldn’t understand Chaldean. And the Lord spoke to
Israel as a sign in these other tongues and other languages, and yet they
didn’t repent and they didn’t believe.
Now Paul
takes that prophecy out of Isaiah, and he applies it to what God is doing to
the Jewish nation and the Jewish people. “Wherefore,” he says, “tongues
are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not.”
It is a sign! Well, I can see that now plainly. Pentecost, there
were three signs to the Jewish nation and the Jewish people, to the Jews in
Jerusalem. At the beginning of this new dispensation, there were
three—there were three signs from God that this is of heaven; a new
dispensation, a new era.
First, the
sound as of a rushing, mighty wind: pneuma, breath, a type of the Holy
Spirit. Second, fire that clove, that split, that parted, flaming above
each one. Fire is a sign of the Holy Spirit. Third, the gift of
tongues. And they spake the word of God in the languages of all of the
people, the Jewish people who had gathered there for Pentecostal Feast day from
the ends of the earth. It was a sign to the Jewish nation, I can see
that. And the same thing happened at Caesarea. The speaking in tongues was a
sign, as Paul says; it is a sign, for there were those Jewish brethren who came
with Simon Peter into the house of the Gentile Cornelius, and when they
returned to Jerusalem in the eleventh chapter of the Book of Acts, Peter and
those Jews were called on the carpet.
Jew went
into the house of a Gentile—and it is not lawful for a Jew to go into his
house, much less eat with them—and Paul—and, and Simon Peter replied, “But, my
brothers, we saw the sign from God!” That’s what he said: “this thing that
happened at Pentecost, the sign from God that this is the gospel of the new
dispensation, that same sign saw we at Caesarea, for we saw these Gentiles
speak with tongues, even as we saw at Pentecost.” I understand
that. The gift of tongues was the sign gift as Paul says to the Jewish
nation, to the Jewish people in introducing the new dispensation.
But to a
Gentile—now I’m going to continue, the next verse—but to us, to us, if the
church comes together and you speak in tongues, and there comes a visitor by,
he will say, “You are mainesthe! You are mad! You are
insane!” But if a man prophesies, if he promethe, if he speaks
intelligently, and there come in that man unbelieving, the secrets of his heart
will be manifest, he will be convicted in his soul, and he will bow down and
worship God and say, “God is among you and true.” The sign was for the
Jewish nation and the Jewish people as you see at Pentecost, as you see at
Caesarea.
But when
you turn to the Gentile world, to preach the gospel of the Son of God, could
you imagine, in your wildest imagination, could you imagine Paul standing on
Mars Hill before the court of the Areopagus, the Supreme Court of the Athenian
nation—could you imagine Paul standing there before the Areopagus speaking in
tongues, and Silas standing by his side to interpret? They would have
said, “They are insane. They are mad.”
“Just the
facts, mister, just tell us the facts.” Tongues were for a sign, and when
the sign had done its purpose, it ceased. We shall preach on that.
Tongues shall cease, said Paul.
And to
recreate the sign is an affront to God! It is not faith! It is
presumption! Oh, my soul, the parting of the Red Sea under the hand of
Moses—and we stand there and say, “Lord God, do it again! Part the Red
Sea! Why, You did it, do it again! Let's see it!” It was a
sign under the hand of Moses delivering God’s people in a new dispensation,
that of the law. Do it again? It has served its purpose.
And Elijah
went up to heaven in a whirlwind, and Elijah saw the chariot of fire and the
horses of fire. And we stand by the side of a godly prophet Isaiah, a John
the Baptist, a Peter, a Paul, and we say, “Do it again! Let’s see you go
up into heaven in a chariot of fire! Do it again.” How beautiful
the story of the incarnation. And the angels came and they spake.
Leroy says they sang; God says they spake. Just depends on which one you
want to follow. And they spake, and it was a glorious power. And we
stand out under the night sky and say, “Lord, do it again! Let’s hear the
angels speak according to the Word of God, and sing according to Leroy
Till—let’s see if He can do it. Do it again.” Or the star comes:
“Lord, do it again!” And they spake with tongues, a sign at Pentecost;
“Lord, do it again! Do it again.” You finally disrupt the very purpose
of God! And Paul says the unbelievers come by, and they say you are mainomai,
you have lost your mind. Is that a compliment to the house of God and to
the kingdom of Jesus?
Well, what
does he say for us then? Ah, he has a lot to say to us. He starts
at verse 6. He starts at verse 6: “Now, brethren, if I come unto you
speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you? If I speak in an unknown
language and an unknown tongue, what shall I profit you? Except I speak
to you by revelation or by knowledge or by prophesying or by doctrine in
understandable language, what shall I profit you? Why,” he says, “even
things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a
distinction of sound, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?”
Just make
a conglomerate out of that organ, and then somebody try to play it and see if
it makes music. Every sound, every note has to be distinct and
understood. What if the trumpet gives an uncertain sound? Who is to
prepare himself to battle? When I turn to the thirty-third chapter of Ezekiel,
God says, “I put you on a wall, a watchman, and when you see the sword come,
blow the trumpet! If you don’t blow the trumpet and the people die, their
blood will I require at your hand.” “The trumpet has to give a certain
sound. So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongues words easy to be
understood, how shall it be known what is spoken? For ye shall speak into
the air” [1
Corinthians 14:9].
Paul is making appeal for what is sane, and understandable, and intelligent,
and decent, and in order! Why, I just feel the throb of a man as he
speaks. When you come to church and when the people are gathered
together, speak in an intelligent language.
And then
finally—and I must close—when the whole church comes together in one place,
verse 23 and 25, there come in those that are unbelievers. If you are
talking in tongues, will they not say, “you are mad?” But if all prophesy and
speak out to edification, to encouragement, to faith, to trust, to belief, if
all prophesy and there come in one that believeth not, he’s convinced of all,
he's judged of all, and the secrets of his heart are made manifest and the
Spirit of God convicts him. And so, falling down on his face, he will
worship God and report that God is among you in truth. That’s the way,
says Paul; that’s the way. The sign was for the Jewish nation at the
beginning of the new dispensation. It served its purpose. It is
done. It has ceased. No need for this kind. But now, when you come
together in church, let God call the lost to faith and the commitment by a
plain and an understandable word. And the simpler you can make it, the
more effective will God use it and bless it.
For God
does not call His people to faith by sign, and by wonders, and by miracles, and
by voices, and by tongues, and by strange sounds; but when God speaks to your
heart, it will be in a plain and a simple language, and that is all that we
would ask. Trusting Jesus, we are not looking for an intervention from
heaven. We are not looking for a sign or a wonder. It is enough that “Jesus died
for our sins according to the Scriptures, that He was buried, and that the
third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures” [1
Corinthians 15:3-4].
And it is enough that Jesus has promised those that “come unto Me, I will in no
wise cast out” [John
6:37].
They that received Him, “to them gave He the right to become children of God,
even unto them that trust in His name,” and that’s enough [John
1:11-12].
He doesn’t
call us in these marvelous, marvelous signs that introduced the new
dispensations. He calls us in simple faith to trust for Jesus—minus signs,
minus voices, minus strange phenomena, minus miracles—just trusting Jesus; that
is all, and more than enough.
I heard
the choir one time sing a song, and the first stanza and the chorus of that
song has lingered in my mind. “Just trusting Jesus, and it’s enough; don’t
need anything else, that’s enough.” And I asked Leroy if he wouldn’t sing that
stanza and that chorus for us; catch its spirit and its commitment of love and
grace and trust to Jesus. It’s enough, sing it:
My faith
has found a resting place,
Not in
device nor creed;
I trust
the ever living One,
His
wounds for me shall plead.
I need no
other argument,
I need no
other plea,
It is
enough that Jesus died,
And that
He died for me.
[“My Faith
Has Found a Resting Place”; Eliza E. Hewitt, 1891]
Isn’t that
the Gospel? “I need no other argument, I need no other plea,” even in an
unknown tongue. “It is enough that Jesus died, and that He died for me.”
Why, if God were to give a sign, I might wonder at it and thank Him for the
grace so sweetly vouchsafed, but I wouldn’t think of it in terms of being
needed as an addendum to my confidence in Jesus. “It is enough that Jesus
died, and that He died for me.” Come in to the Lord, minus signs, minus
miracles, minus wonders, just trusting Jesus, and that’s all.
That’s the
invitation we press to your heart this morning; you, you, trusting the Lord.
“Here I am, giving my soul to Jesus. Here I stand.” A couple you, come, a
couple you—oh! what a precious fellowship is this church—a family you, one
somebody you, when we sing in a moment this hymn of commitment, “My Faith Looks
Up to Thee,” on the first note of the first stanza, come, come. When you stand
up, stand up coming. “Wife, let’s go. This is God’s house. This is Bethel.
This is the gate to heaven.” Come, in this balcony ‘round, on this lower
floor, come. Do it now, make it now, while we stand and while we sing.