TO THE CHURCH AT COLOSSE
Dr. W. A. Criswell
Colossians 1
7-14-57 10:50 a.m.
You are sharing with us the services of the First
Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas. This is the pastor bringing the eleven
o’clock morning message on the Book of Colossians. Last Sunday night, we
concluded in our preaching through the Bible—we concluded preaching in the Book
of Philippians, Paul’s letter to the church at Philippi. Now, this morning, we
begin in the letter of Paul to the church at Colosse, and if you will open your
Bibles, you can easily follow the message at this morning hour.
The epistle of Paul, the apostle, to the
Colossians and the title of the sermon is To the Church at Colosse. The
first two verses of the first chapter are these:
Paul, an
apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timotheus our brother,
To the
saints and faithful brethren in Christ which are at Colosse: Grace be unto you,
and peace, from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.
Tonight we begin at the third verse and preach
through the sixth. This morning the sermon is an introductory address to the
sermons that shall be preached in this letter of Paul to the church at
Colosse. For us to have any feeling of being at home at all in the epistle, we
must have this introductory background.
The Roman Empire was divided into provinces. Some
of them were imperial. They were under the crown. They were administered by
armies. Any recalcitrant province was placed under the emperor, who governed
it by an army. Judea was one of the imperial provinces, that is, under Caesar
himself, and was administered by a procurator, that is, a man personally
responsible to the emperor. There were also provinces which were senatorial
provinces. They were provinces who lived at peace, and they were administered
by the Roman senate. The richest and most famous of all of the Roman provinces
was the province of Asia. Asia Minor was filled with Greek cities—had been for
centuries and centuries.
Some of the great and noble of the philosophers, of
the historians, of the artists, lived over there along those Ionian cities that
bordered the Aegean Sea in Asia Minor. Now, the great province of the Roman
Empire, in Asia Minor, was called Asia. From that word, it has come to
designate the entire, great continental expanse of modern Asia. But the word
first referred to a Roman province that faced the Aegean Sea. The capital of
the Roman province of Asia was named Ephesus. It was one of the great cities
of the empire; first, Rome; second, Alexandria; third, Antioch—Syrian Antioch;
and fourth, Ephesus.
Now, about seventy-five miles—in the province of
Asia—down the coast south, there is a river that pours into the sea called the
Meander, and about a hundred miles up the Meander River, there is another river
that pours into it called the Lycus. And in that Lycus Valley, there were
three very famous churches. They all three are named here in the Book of
Colossians.
First, there was the church at Laodicea. It was a
wealthy and popular city on the south side of the Lycus River. Just across the
river on the other side was another city called Hierapolis, the sacred city,
Hierapolis. It was in full view of Laodicea. They were on either side of the
Lycus River. Then on the south side of the Lycus River, on the same side of
Laodicea about nine or ten miles up, was this smaller city named Colosse. Now,
the churches of the Lycus River, I say, were very, very famous. And the cities
were very famous; though they were far inland, yet they were noted in the days
of the Roman empire. Hierapolis, that’s the Greek word for “sacred city”—the
word for sacred, hieron; city, polis; Indianapolis,
Annapolis—just a Greek word for city, polis.
Hierapolis was a health resort; and because of the
vapors that came out of the depths of the earth, they had priestesses there,
like the Apollo Delphian oracle. They called her a pythoness. She would sit
on a tripod and, overcome by the fumes of the vapor, she was supposed to have
the spirit and art of divination. Consequently, it became known as a great and
sacred city, and people resorted there to know their fortunes. That’s
Hierapolis. Epictetus, the greatest Stoic philosopher and moralist of the
heathen world, was a proud citizen of Hierapolis.
On the other side of the river, this church of
Laodicea. Seleucus Nicator, one of the four great generals of Alexander, had a
passion for building beyond any prince I have ever read of. His father was
named Antiochus—Antioch—and his mother was named Laodicea. All over the
eastern part of the Mediterranean you’ll find Antiochs and Laodiceas.
This Laodicea was a great and wealthy and popular
city. John writes a letter to it in the Book of the Revelation. It is the
last of the seven churches to whom John addressed his letters—Jesus addressed
His words. Laodicea was on the road between Ephesus and the Euphrates and
became very wealthy. When an earthquake destroyed it, Tacitus, the Roman
historian, says that the people were so affluent that they did not call on aid
from Rome to rebuild the city, but they built it themselves—like you’d call on
Washington to help you in a disaster. Well, they didn’t do that. They were so
wealthy, they built their city themselves. Cicero wrote some of his letters
from this famous city of Laodicea.
Now, up the Lycus Valley was this small town of
Colosse. It’s the smallest church to which Paul ever addressed a letter. In
the long ago, Herodotus and Xenophon say it was a great city. But it had
fallen due to the rise of Laodicea and Hierapolis. And in Paul’s time, it was
a small town. But they had some marvelous people there, one of whom was
Philemon, who had a slave named Onesimus who ran away, who was converted by
Paul in Rome, and to whom Paul sent back the converted runaway slave, Onesimus,
with a letter to Philemon who lived in Colosse.
Now, Colosse was the—with all the churches of the
Lycus Valley—Colosse was the product of evangelists, missionary teachers and
leaders who were won to Christ through the effect of Paul’s great ministry in
Ephesus. Paul had never been there. He had never seen them. The churches in
the Lycus Valley had been won to the Lord by a man name Epaphras.
In the second chapter of Colossians, the first
[verse], Paul says, “I have for you a great conflict, and for them at Laodicea,
and for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh.” That is, Paul had
never been there. He had never seen these converts. In the seventh verse of
the first chapter of Colossians, he says that they learned the gospel “from
Epaphras our dear fellow servant, who for you is a faithful minister of
Christ.”
Now, it is easy to understand that Paul was in the
great capital city named Ephesus, and he stayed there for three years. And in
the nineteenth chapter of the Book of Acts and the tenth verse, it says, “So
that all they which dwelt in Asia heard the word of Lord Jesus, both Jews and
Greeks.” And in the same nineteenth chapter of Acts, Demetrius, the
silversmith—who is raising a riot against Paul at Ephesus—he says to those
people there, “And not alone at Ephesus, but almost throughout all Asia, this
Paul hath persuaded and turned away much people, saying that they be no gods,
which are made with hands.”
Now, Paul held a tremendous evangelistic campaign
and revival meeting in the city of Ephesus. And from that campaign, from that
revival, there poured out converts through all of that Roman province—just like
you’re seeing now in New York City. Charles G. Finney held a revival meeting
in the last century in Rochester, New York, and had over a hundred thousand
converts, and yet the city itself had a population of only fifty thousand.
That’s what happened in Ephesus. Paul preached
the gospel there with such power that the word overflowed throughout the
province. And a product of that ministry, through this convert Epaphras, was
the organization of these churches in the Lycus Valley, at Hierapolis, at
Laodicea, and at Colosse.
Now, Paul is in Rome, and this man Epaphras has
made a journey to Rome because of a great burden on his heart for the churches
in the Lycus Valley. In the fourth chapter of the Book of Colossians it says,
twelfth verse and thirteenth, “Epaphras, who is one of you, a servant of
Christ, saluteth you, always laboring fervently”—the Greek is agonizo,
agonizing—“for you in prayers, that ye may stand perfect and complete in all
the will of God. For I bear him record, that he hath a great zeal for you, and
for them that are in Laodicea, and for them in Hierapolis.”
What is it that so exercised and so burdened the
heart of Epaphras that he made the journey to Rome in order to lay the problem
before the Apostle Paul? And what was it that so afflicted this little
congregation there at Colosse that Paul sat down and wrote this letter in order
to help them meet this heretical development in their midst?
Well, it is something that is foreign and alien to
us today. When I tell you what it is, you will be amazed that such an
aberration should have ever afflicted the philosophical or intellectual worship
of men, much less their Christian worship. But it was a thing that swept the
Roman Empire in the first Christian centuries, and well nigh challenged unto
death the preaching of the gospel.
It was a heresy called the gnostic heresy. The
philosophical approach to the worship of God in gnosticism. Now, I have to
tell you what that stuff is, briefly—there are books and books on it—or else
you’ll never enter into what this thing is about. But it has an application
today that I hope will be very pertinent to us.
Gnosticism was the superiority and intellectual
appreciation and philosophical acumen by which the initiates were saved. But
all of the rest of the people who were not initiates—the common ones, the dumb
ones, the ordinary ones, the hoi polloi—well, they never entered into those
mysteries. That’s the reason it was called gnosticism. The Greek word for
knowledge is gnosis, and the gnostics were “the knowing ones.” And all the
rest of them didn’t know.
Well, over there in the center of Asia Minor, in
the old Roman province of Phrygia, a part of which is now a Roman province of
Asia, Antiochus Epiphanes, the tyrant and oppressor of the Jews, had settled
from Mesopotamia about two thousand Jewish families. And over there in that
country, they were very amenable to not only Jewish ceremonialism, but to
Oriental mysticism and to Greek philosophy. Now, a posit, a fundamental tenet,
of that intellectual approach was this: that God was good. I hear some
religionists today speak of this same thing. God is good, and everything He
touches is good, and there’s nothing evil, you know, and on and on and on. God
is good. God is good. That’s the first one. The second great tenet is this:
matter is evil. Matter is evil, that is, inherently evil—evil in itself.
So the philosophical problem they had to solve was
this: how did the good God create evil matter? The good God cannot touch evil
matter and yet here it is, evil, your body, everything that is matter.
Everything is evil, they said. And God is only good and all good.
Well, how do you get the two together? Well,
their philosophical induction approach produced this: they did it by a series
of emanations, eons, mediators. Went like this: the great good God up there,
high and all-powerful, created an eon, an emanation, a lower angel. And then
that emanation created another one, and that eon created another one. And that
angel created another one, and that mediator created another one, until finally
you got an angel or a mediator or an eon or an emanation down here that’s far
enough from God to touch evil matter, to have created evil matter, and yet able
and powerful enough to have created it. So they separated between God above
and between evil matter below, a long series of emanations, of eons, of angels,
one creating the other.
Now, when they met Christianity, what they did was
they made Jesus one of those emanations. Some of those gnostics would put Him
in the middle. Most of them put Him at the bottom. And that was their
solution to all of the problems that they found in this evil world, and a good
God.
Now, it turned an unusual way ethically. As they
met the problems of ethics—why, it took a double turn. One, asceticism,
monasticism, a thing that you’ll find in Buddhism; a thing you’ll find in
Stoicism; a thing you’ll find in certain kinds of monastic Christianity—people
who live behind walls and dress a certain way. It turned in a monastic way.
They felt that matter was evil. The body is evil; therefore, it must be
afflicted. It must be tormented. It must be mortified. And it turned to
asceticism.
The other strange turn which is opposite, the
other turned to antinomianism. “Antinomianism” is a word referring to lawlessness;
that is, you’re not bound by any law. Antinomianism, anti-law. And that
turned to license, of course, to Epicureanism; to Nicolaitanism, to the Ophites,
that is, matter was evil, but couldn’t touch the soul. So it didn’t matter
what you did. You’d slough off this evil body at death, and the soul was
perfectly pure and untouched because evil was only in matter and not in the
soul.
Now, those are philosophical aberrations—and I
apologize for trying to say such a vast amount in such a little bit of time.
I’m afraid you don’t get a good picture of it, but you get enough of it to see
what Paul’s going to write about.
Now, there came into that church this gnostic
heresy. First of all, this thing of intellectual superiority—and Paul has some
things to say about that. For example, in the twenty-eighth verse of the first
chapter of Colossians, look how he emphasized, talking about this great gospel
of the Son of God: “Whom we preach, warning every man”—not just a few, not just
an intellectual caste, not just some superior ones, but every man—“and teaching
every man in all wisdom: that we may present every man perfect in Christ
Jesus.”
Now, look at that. In that one verse you’ve got
that three times. This Jesus whom we preach, and the gospel warning “every
man,” teaching “every man” in all wisdom that we may present “every man” mature
in Christ Jesus. Paul says there is no such thing as any man or any group of
men having—now, could I say it vernacularly?—having a corner on spiritual
truth.
How often do you find certain men set aside? They
set themselves aside and they say they are the ones who alone can interpret the
Word of God. They alone are called of God to mediate the wisdom revealed in
Christ Jesus. Just they, and they are the clergy. They are the priests. They
are set aside in sacerdotal intellectualism. They are there, apart. And the
laity, the common people, are to bow and to kiss and to receive from their hand
these revelations of God.
Paul says, “Not so!” There is no such thing as a
sacerdotal intellectual caste in the Christian faith, but every man is his own
priest. And every man is his own intercessor before God, and every man can be
taught and can know the wisdom of God and can grow into the perfection of
Christ Jesus. In other words, there’s not anything that I know or that I study
or that I preach that you cannot know, that you cannot study, that you cannot
preach. There’s no special gnosis, no special knowledge, of mine. There’s not
anything that I can understand that you cannot understand.
The only difference in us is this: that while
you’re out there toiling and making a living, either selling or buying or going
or coming, you have liberated me to sit there in my study and with this open
Bible, to prepare these messages. But there is no peculiar gnosis in it.
There’s no peculiar knowledge in it. There’s no unusual intellectual
achievement in it, but the dumbest and the poorest and the most untaught among
us can be brought to the saving knowledge and wisdom of Christ, as well as the
most intellectually able in our midst.
What does false intellectualism do to a people?
I’ll tell you what it does. You go with me to those seminaries, mostly in the
North and in the East, and let us visit those seminaries and listen to those
philosophers as they speculate, as they philosophize, as they enter into all of
those things by which they look upon themselves as being purveyors of the
higher intellectual culture, and let’s see what they do to the preacher.
Does the preacher, when he gets through that
seminary course, does he go out aflame, afire? Does he go out with a heart
burning? Does he go out in a great missionary enterprise? Does he go out to
take hold two-fisted of the problems of the world and move it to God? No! He
doesn’t go out at all. He doesn’t even preach. There are not enough men
graduated from those seminaries who actually preach even to name or to refer to
them. There is something about gnosticism, so prideful—intellectualism.
There’s something about a cultured, cheap veneer that somehow deadens the heart
and ruins the spirit and takes away the minister of Jesus Christ. It did it
here at Colosse.
You turn to the last chapter of this book and see
what Paul says to the pastor there at Colosse. The seventeenth verse. In the
first chapter of Philemon, you’ll find this boy named Archippus is the pastor
of the church at Colosse. Now, he’s over there in the midst of that
intellectual, speculative, reptilian philosophy. And Epaphras is away, and
Archippus is there. Now, look what Paul says to Archippus: “And say to
Archippus, Take heed to the ministry which thou hast received in the Lord, that
thou fulfil it.”
“Archippus, that gnosis, that intellectual
aberration, has taken you away. You’ve become tepid. You’ve lost your heart.
You’ve lost the fervor of your life and your soul.”
It’s like a man having malaria, and his body
whitens. So this man, Archippus, who’s the pastor of the church, falling into
intellectualism, into speculative philosophy, into all of those things by
which—I listen to these kids after they’ve just come out of school. Oh, such
things, such things! There is no such thing as learning God in speculative
philosophy.
Paul says here in the second chapter, “Beware lest
any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, and after the tradition
of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ”—the rudiments
of the world. He calls all of it vain, intellectual, speculative philosophy,
rudiments, ABCs. What does Paul mean by that? He means that a man, by his
intellectual powers and ability and ingeniousness, a man might learn the ABCs
of the world. That is, he might see that the earth is round. He might see
that a star shines. He might see that a bug moves. He might see that a rock
weighs. He might learn those things, but he can never know God. You can never
learn God through the rudiments of this world, through speculative philosophy.
You listen to me. Had there been a way for a man
intellectually to know God through speculative philosophy, the Greeks would
have found Him thousands of years ago. There have never been any group of men
like those men who lived in the golden age of Pericles. There have never been
historians. There have never been artists. There have never been poets. There
have never been rhetoricians. There have never been philosophers. There have
never been teachers like those in the ancient Greek world, and yet they never
found God.
The only way that a man finds God is through the
revelation in Jesus Christ. It comes through the self-disclosure of God
Himself. And the great wisdom which Paul says here is open to every man—the
great and true knowledge, the saving gnosis is in Christ Jesus. And the
humblest among us can sit at the feet of Jesus and learn the highest knowledge
in God’s heaven and upon God’s earth.
I’m not saying we ought not to study, we ought not
to send our children to school, and we ought not to read what men say. I am
just avowing that the pride of heart and the intellectual superiority that is
assumed by these karma rats who are so filled with undigested information that
they can’t fly—I am just saying that we’re not to sit at their feet and seek to
learn about God. That’s all. These ministerial dilettantes who are out with
just so much; men who lack deep convictions never build missions. They never
win the lost. They never warm the cold heart. They never seize upon the need
of this world.
They’re too busy philosophizing, speculating,
living in an aura up there somewhere beyond the clouds. If Christianity is
anything in this earth, it’s down here where we are. It’s down here where we
live. It’s where your heart is and soul is. It’s the message of the Son of
God for you.
Well, we have got the first syllable. It’s very
difficult for me to take these services and crowd into them what ought to be
said. May I just briefly now—just summarizing—say one or two other things
about this thing at Colosse? You know, I said that they posited a great number
of mediators between us and God. Isn’t it a tragedy? Isn’t it a tragedy that
the church at Rome didn’t read this epistle?
“There is one mediator between man and God; the
man Christ Jesus.” That’s what Paul said about that. There is one. There is
only one. You look here as Paul will say, this Christ—this Christ, “it pleased
the Father”—in the first chapter and the nineteenth verse and following—“It
pleased the Father that in Him should all fulness dwell, and, having made peace
through the blood of His cross, by Him to reconcile all things unto Himself; by
Him”—not by her or it, but “by Him, I say.” [Colossians
1:19]
See how Paul emphasized the thing? Look at it: “It
pleased the Father that in Him should all fulness dwell; and, having made peace
through the blood of His cross, by Him to reconcile all things unto Himself; by
Him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.” There is
one mediator between God and man, one. It’s not a virgin. It’s not a she.
It’s not a saint. It’s not a priest. It’s not a hierarchy. It is a Him, the
Lord Jesus Christ. “And, having made peace through the blood of His cross, by
Him to reconcile all things unto Himself; by Him, I say, whether they be things
in earth, or things in heaven.”
All of these mediators by which ye seek to go to
God, bowing before this one, lighting candles before that one, pleading before
this one, begging for that one to intercede for you—a poor soul; oh, there is
one intercessor and one mediator between man and God, Paul says, the man,
Christ Jesus.
Now, this other thing—just by summary, and that’s
all. This thing of asceticism and this thing of license and antinomianism; now,
look what he’ll say about asceticism. There in the second chapter and the
twenty-first and twenty-second verses. There he says you have some: “Touch
not; taste not; handle not; which all are to perish with the using; after the
commandments and the doctrines of men?” Don’t you eat this. Don’t you touch
that. Don’t you do this; living in all of those rudiments and traditions of
asceticism.
All right. Now, the other—this thing of ceremonial
mandates and commandments. Look at the sixteenth verse. “Let no man therefore
judge you in meat”—what you eat or what you don’t—“drink, or in drink”—only
thing is we wouldn’t want people to indulge in alcohol, but that’s just because
of the body’s health and other people around you, not because inherently
anything itself it would be an evil—“or in respect of an holyday, or of the new
moon, or of the sabbath days.” You’re not to keep the Sabbath day—Saturday,
the Sabbath day—you are not to keep it. “Which are a shadow of things to come;
but the body is of Christ.”
All of those ceremonies and all of the rituals,
all of the holy days and all of the Sabbaths were great times looking forward
to the Lord Jesus. Now that the substance has come, we don’t observe them
anymore. We don’t observe Sabbath anymore. We don’t teach Saturday anymore.
We have the first day of the week, which is a voluntary [day] in which we
worship the Lord Jesus Christ.
I must conclude. Look what he says in the fourth
chapter here about his letters. The sixteenth verse, “And when this epistle is
read among you, cause that it be read also in the church of the Laodiceans; and
that ye likewise read the epistle from Laodicea.” Paul wrote an epistle to the
Laodiceans just like Jesus did in the seven churches of Asia. Well, where’s
that letter that Paul wrote to the Laodiceans? That letter is your letter to
the Ephesians. The Ephesian letter is a circular letter. And in those old
manuscripts, like the Vaticanus and the Sinaiticus—why, it is vacant there
where it says, “to Ephesus.”
Paul wrote the letter as a general letter and a
general encyclical, a general epistle, and that is the letter that went to the
Laodiceans. So he says, “I command you that you read this letter that I’m
writing to the church and that you read the church the letter of the
Laodiceans.”
It’s the same kind of a thing as Paul said here in
1 Thessalonians, the fifth chapter and the twenty-seventh verse: “I charge you
by the Lord that this epistle be read unto all the holy brethren.” By that he
means that the words of the apostle are words of divine authority to the
churches then, to the churches since, to the churches now, and to the churches
forever more. Our sufficient manual of faith and of practice and of doctrine
is to be found in the book that I hold in my hand.
“I commend you,” says Paul, “I commend you that
this epistle be read unto all the holy brethren.” That’s one reason among
others that I like for us to read the thing out loud, like they read it out
loud. When the church assembled themselves together, what they did was, they
read these great epistles of the apostles to the congregation, that they might
know the truth of the doctrine and the order and the worship of Almighty God,
and that’s what we’re doing today.
Well, while we sing our song, while we sing our
song, coming into this aisle and down here to the front to give your heart in
faith to Christ, or to put your life into the fellowship of the church. In
this balcony around, on this lower floor, while we sing the song, while we make
the appeal, you come and stand by me. “Here, pastor, I give you my hand. I
have given my heart in faith and in trust to Jesus.” Or, “Pastor, I give you
my hand. We’ve been saved and baptized, and we’re coming into the church.” As
God shall open the door and lead the way, will you come? While we stand, and
while we sing.